We use cookies to improve your experience on this site. By viewing our pages, you give us consent to use cookies. Find out more.

Are P2P platforms about to face their toughest test yet?

Posted 3 years ago

Share this article:

On Monday GLI Finance wrote down the value of its investments in eight peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms by £12.6 million. The investment company that backs fintech businesses cited “concerns over the collectability of some platform loans.”

Advertised Equity Crowdfunding Pitch

Biohm is an eco-conscious bio-technology company that is revolutionising construction through nature-inspired innovation. The company has adopted methods such as circular construction system, biomimicry, and triagomy. Some of the company’s carbon-negative bio-based materials include building insulation made out of Mycelium (the root structure of mushrooms) and ORB (Organic Refuse Biocompound), a 100% natural sheet material made out of food and agricultural surplus. For its innovation, Biohm won the Waitrose and Partners Plan Plastic Prize: The Million Pound Challenge and a Power to Change grant worth £600,000 to build sustainable living premises. It has also been shortlisted as one of The United Nation’s ‘Young Champions of the Earth’. The company will use 38% of the investment to grow its team, 22% to scale Research and Development (R&D), 22% to protect its Intellectual Property (IP), and 18% for product accreditation.

Pitch Rated



rating powered by


pledged: 89% days to go: 9 investment: £668,465

Click here to view our full Equity Crowdfunding listing

GLIs announcement followed news at the weekend that around a quarter of Lendy Finance’s loan book may well be in default and a letter from Zopa to investors telling them to expect higher than forecast losses thanks to deteriorating credit conditions.


The warnings referenced consumer rather than business lending but there could be a knock-on effect, any slow-down of consumer spending is likely to also feed through to the business sector – albeit with varying degrees of impact dependent on the sector and client base of the business.


Critics of P2P have long cited concerns that the platforms do not manage underwriting risk appropriately, something that the platforms refute. Tougher lending conditions (or rather conditions that make it harder to get money back from debtors) may well be the proving ground that platforms need to answer their critics. Of course, it may also prove the critics right.


What is worth noting is that P2P platforms have adopted different operating and risk models. Direct comparison isn’t necessarily a fair comparison and this is something that many critics overlook.


For investors lending to businesses via P2P getting access to up to date default rates from platforms should feature prominently as part of their decision making and investment monitoring processes. For their part the platforms themselves should be making an effort to get that data out there to investors and providing the information that people need to make an informed decision.

Tagged: business finance P2P lending peer to peer lending GLI Finance invest investment Lendy Zopa risk

Click here to sign up to our newsletter


Log in to comment

We reserve the right to remove comments which are inappropriate and/or offensive.
Comments are not the opinion of Nextfin.uk. Please read the comment guidelines
  • Internet Business Awards Category Award Winner 2015
  • Hertfordshire Business Awards Finalist 2014

As seen in:

  • The Guardian
  • Financial Times
  • Yahoo! Finance
  • The Times
  • The Daily Telegraph